National Magazine Awards

The National Magazine Awards Foundation is a bilingual, not-for-profit institution whose mission is to recognize excellence in the content and creation of Canadian magazines through an annual program of awards.

Important Dates

May 1, 2010 - Tickets Available
May 4, 2010 - Nominations
May 7, 2010 - Credit Changes
May 18, 2010- Early bird deadline
June 4, 2010 - Awards Gala

Stay in Touch

Keep up with the latest news and deadlines from the National Magazine Awards - by signing up for our e-newsletter. [Subscribe]

Follow us on Twitter

 

Contact Us

The National Magazine Awards
425 Adelaide St West, Suite 700
Toronto, ON, M5V 3C1
staff[at]magazine-awards[dot]com
(t) 416.422.1358 (f) 416.504.0437
Follow us on Twitter

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Magazine Fund of the Department of Canadian Heritage.

Governance Policy

In May of 2006, the Board of Directors of the National Magazine Awards Foundation adopted a new set of governance policies that confirmed the mission it first gave itself almost 30 years ago: to recognize excellence in the content and creation of Canadian magazines through an annual program of awards.

Reflecting extensive consultation with the Canadian magazine industry, this document also embraces values such as fairness, credibility, transparency and inclusiveness that will ensure we continue to merit the trust and support of magazine creators and those who publish their work.

1.  Mission, Vision, Values

1.1     Mission

The Mission of the National Magazine Awards Foundation is to recognize excellence in the content and creation of Canadian magazines through an annual program of awards.

1.2     Vision

The National Magazine Awards will be financially viable and nationally recognized and celebrated for inclusiveness, transparency and high standards.

In three years it will:

1.3     Values

We value excellence in written and visual editorial content in Canadian magazines and strive to reward those who create it.

We value the efforts of those in the industry who support the creators, and recognize these contributions where appropriate.

While different types of journalism serve different purposes, we believe that excellent content entails clarity, originality and creativity, and engages the reader for whom it was intended.

We are committed to an awards program that reflects the evolving presentation of content and methods of publication in the Canadian magazine industry.

We are committed to a governing process that is fair, credible and transparent.

 

2.  The Role of the Board

2.1     Non-profit Boards

The Board of Directors of a non-profit organization has a responsibility to provide the following: 

2.2     The National Magazine Awards Board of Directors

The Board of the National Magazine Awards Foundation (NMAF) governs the process by which the Foundation awards excellence in magazine publishing in Canada. It meets its responsibilities through the following functions:

2.3     NMAF Board Composition

The NMAF Board consists of 15 members. Ideally, at least three of these are from outside Ontario, including one from Quebec. NMAF Board members are generally drawn from within the magazine industry, both staff members and freelance contributors. However, the Board may include members drawn from other professions whose skills and experience are relevant (up to a maximum of 25 per cent of the Board at any given time). 

The Board meets six times per year, or when deemed necessary by the President. Board members who do not reside in Toronto join in by conference call. 

 

3.  Board Member Terms and Responsibilities

3.1     Recruitment, nomination and election

While all Board members are encouraged to identify potential Board members, responsibility for recruitment rests with the Vice-President. The process is as follows:

Board members can be elected at any time during the year, at the recommendation of the Vice-President. However, the AGM will always mark the end of Board members' terms.

3.2     Terms of Office

Board members are elected for a three-year renewable term. The Presidential term is two years. If a Board member resigns, the new appointee completes their term, then can stand for re-election for a full term.

3.3     Responsibilities

Once elected, Board Members are expected to:

Note: Board members are encouraged to review their personal performance on an annual basis to ensure they are making a meaningful contribution.

 

4.  Board Committees

4.1     The Executive Committee:    

 The objectives of the Executive Committee are:

Membership: President (chair), Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer. The Managing Director attends by invitation.

Annual Tasks

4.2     The Judging Committee

The objective of the Judging Committee is to ensure that Board-approved policies with respect to judging are implemented appropriately.

Membership: Chair (drawn from the NMAF Board, preferably with judging committee experience) and a minimum of two others, of whom one is French/bilingual and one is qualified to oversee the visual judging process.

Role of the Judging Committee Chair

Annual Tasks

The annual tasks of the Judging Committee include:

4.3     The Event Committee

The objective of the Event Committee is to ensure that the NMAF awards presentation reflects the missions, vision and values of the NMAF and is produced in accordance with an approved budget.

Membership: Chair (drawn from the NMAF Board) and three other members, at least one of whom must be from the NMAF Board. Others may be industry professionals who have an interest in the NMAF and relevant experience (e.g. creative, print production, event/project management). 

Annual Tasks

4.4     Publicity Committee

The objective of the Publicity Committee is to heighten awareness and increase the profile of the Magazine Awards in Canada.

Membership: A Chair (drawn from the NMAF Board) and up to two other members, dependant on the interest and skills represented on the Board and the needs of the Foundation at any time. 

Annual Tasks:

4.5     Finance Committee

The Executive Committee fulfills the role of the Finance Committee.

 

5.  Officer’s Terms and Responsibilities

5.1     Terms of Office:

Board officers are elected at the Annual General Meeting. Officers are elected for one-year renewable terms of office. The President may not serve more than two years in office.

5.2     President

5.3     Vice-President

5.4     Past President

5.5     Secretary

5.6     Treasurer

 

6.  Statement of Accountability

The National Magazine Awards Foundation is accountable to the Magazine Industry in Canada. This includes those who create magazine content and those who publish their works.

MMAF is committed to informing and consulting with its stakeholders and to involving members of the magazine industry in its activities wherever possible. The means for doing this are outlined below.

Information

Consultation

Involvement

 

7.  Code of Ethics

7.1     Code of Ethics

NMAF Board Members will conduct themselves in an ethical manner and commit to:

7.2     Conflict of Interest Guidelines

A conflict of interest occurs when any NMAF Board Member, employee or volunteer, any member of their family, or a close personal or professional associate, or their business reaps a personal or financial benefit from their association with the Board. 

The NMAF Board is committed to resolving all real, perceived or potential conflicts of interest. Board members should declare any real, perceived or potential conflicts and should refrain from participating in any discussion of, or voting on any matters that constitute a conflict of interest. All declarations of conflict and subsequent resolutions should be recorded in the minutes. 

Given the mandate of the NMAF, it is essential that all members of the Judging Committee and any judges appointed by that committee are perceived to have no conflict of interest and/or loyalty to a particular publication or member of the magazine industry which may impact their ability to judge a category impartially. All potential conflicts of interest of this nature should be disclosed to the Chair of the Judging Committee for resolution.

 

8.  Judging Guidelines and Processes

The following general guidelines and rules apply to all judging categories, except when noted otherwise. Detailed descriptions of the process, by category, are available on-line and in print for both judges and entrants.

8.1     Criteria

All categories will be judged on five equally weighted areas: style, content, creativity, ability to engage intended reader, and overall impact.

All entries will be required to include the magazine’s mission statement to ensure that the judges can adequately assess the entry.

8.2     Judging Process

Most written entries are judged in a two-tier judging process. During the first tier, French and English judges each choose a maximum of ten finalists (minimum score of 80). Best Student Writer, Best New Writer and President’s Medal are judged by a single tier of three bilingual judges. A single-tiered panel consisting of three judges, of whom at least one is bilingual, judges the integrated categories (Magazine Covers and Words & Pictures).

In the second tier, a panel of three bilingual judges rates the finalists from each category and scores them out of 100.

Final scores are an aggregate of first tier scores and second tier scores. The first tier of judging carries more influence on the final outcome of the judging. This acknowledges the specific expertise and knowledge of the judges in the field for which they are judging.  

8.3     Supporting Judges

Judges in all categories receive a “survival guide”, a written explanation of how the judging process works. For visual judges, there should be a description of each category, to ensure that they know what they are looking for (eg. Service, Visual, Art Direction). 

All judges are requested to participate in a conveniently scheduled conference call with other judges on their panel. Each member of the NMAF Board is asked to facilitate one call, to ensure that they understand and are engaged in the process. The rest of the calls will be contracted out to someone with appropriate professional credentials.

In addition, a moderator is contracted to oversee the visual judging process and someone from the Judging Committee should also attend.

8.4     Category Review

Honouring our commitment to reflect evolving methods of presentation and publication of content, the NMAF will review its categories on an annual basis.

Stakeholders from the industry will be asked to provide feedback on the clarity of category description, the relevancy of the current roster of awards and to note any areas of content and creation that are not included.

The bottom 20 per cent of categories, in terms of the number of applicants, will be reviewed annually to ensure their ongoing viability to the Foundation and relevance to the industry.

 

9.  Relationship to Managing Director

9. 1     Job Description

The Managing Director of the NMAF is entrusted with managing all of the operations of the Foundation and with the implementation of Board-approved policy. Major areas of responsibility are outlined below.

Revenue Management: Maintain and increase revenues from all sources including ticket sales, sponsorships, government grants and other revenue streams.

Marketing and Communications: Develop and implement an integrated communications and marketing plan to increase the profile of the awards within the magazine industry and beyond.

Event Coordination: Ensure that all aspects of the annual award event are implemented in a cost effective and efficient manner and reflect the high standards of the NMAF. 

Judging Process: Oversee and coordinate all aspects of judging, including selection of appropriate personnel, to ensure that the process is implemented in a timely and efficient manner.

General Administration: Manage administration of all areas of operations including finance, board support, and hiring consultants and contract staff.

Committee Support: The Managing Director attends and participates in all Committee meetings but is not a voting member.

 

10.  Board Evaluation Checklist

The following checklists will be distributed to all members of the Board at least one week prior to the June Board meeting.

10.1     Full Board Evaluation

On an annual basis the Board will consider whether it has:

10.2     Individual Board Member Evaluation

On an annual basis, individual Board members should ask themselves if they have: